2004-02-19                     House Journal                      Page 2663
HB 285                                                                                            
The following was read the second time:                                                             
                                                                                                    
    HOUSE BILL NO. 285                                                                              
    "An Act adopting the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act;                                       
    repealing certain statutes relating to electronic records and                                   
    electronic signatures; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of                                       
    Evidence; and providing for an effective date."                                                 
                                                                                                    
with the:                                                   Journal Page                            
                                                                                                    
 L&C RPT 2DP 4NR                                                     1590                           
 FN1: ZERO(GOV/ALL DEPTS)                                            1591                           
 JUD RPT CS(JUD) 7DP                                                 2374                           
 FN2: ZERO(DNR)                                                      2374                           
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:                             
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 285(JUD)                                                                  
    (same title)                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that                                       
CSHB 285(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading,                                   
and placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so                                   
ordered.                                                                                            
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
CSHB 285(JUD) was read the third time.                                                              
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 285(JUD) pass the House?"  The                                     
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           

2004-02-19                     House Journal                      Page 2664
                                                                                                    
CSHB 285(JUD)                                                                                       
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  38   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  1                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg,                                 
Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh,                                    
Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg,                                           
Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson,                                   
Wolf                                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Kohring                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Moses                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 285(JUD) passed the House.                                                             
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
CSHB 285(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.